<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice coding standard documents for C# (and VB.NET)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freddes.se/2008/12/30/nice-coding-standard-documents-for-c-and-vbnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freddes.se/2008/12/30/nice-coding-standard-documents-for-c-and-vbnet/</link>
	<description>...because I&#039;m a nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Edmonson</title>
		<link>http://www.freddes.se/2008/12/30/nice-coding-standard-documents-for-c-and-vbnet/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Edmonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freddes.se/?p=667#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to my blog post. I hope your readers enjoy the content.

From my experience, adding &quot;this.&quot; provides a great deal of clarity when reading code and when writing code, give you intellisense on the current class. You wouldn&#039;t believe how many times I&#039;ve seen duplicate methods written in a large class because the developer did not know a method already existed and added a new one next to the method he was working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to my blog post. I hope your readers enjoy the content.</p>
<p>From my experience, adding &#8220;this.&#8221; provides a great deal of clarity when reading code and when writing code, give you intellisense on the current class. You wouldn&#8217;t believe how many times I&#8217;ve seen duplicate methods written in a large class because the developer did not know a method already existed and added a new one next to the method he was working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Svennerberg</title>
		<link>http://www.freddes.se/2008/12/30/nice-coding-standard-documents-for-c-and-vbnet/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Svennerberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freddes.se/?p=667#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I like stuff like this. After a quick look a the C# document I too think it looks good. Most of it adheres to the style I personally use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like stuff like this. After a quick look a the C# document I too think it looks good. Most of it adheres to the style I personally use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

